OPTIONAL · $6.99 USD · ONE PAYMENT

Make your result
a little more useful.

The free test gives you all your scores and core explanations. The personal report adds a detailed reading of your responses, practical experiments, and a seven-day reflection plan.

Grounded in your answers

See your actual responses beside each interpretation, including mixed signals that an average can hide.

Something to put into practice

Explore strengths and tensions with specific experiments, counterexamples, and questions for daily life.

Yours to keep

Read online, download the complete PDF, and save a private backup to restore access on another device.

One report covers one set of answers. No subscription. Any applicable tax is shown at checkout. This is a structured reflection workbook; purchasing does not make the questionnaire more scientifically certain. Purchase terms.

COMPLETE FICTIONAL SAMPLE

See the report before you choose.

These illustrative answers do not belong to a real person and are not your result. The sections and level of detail match the personal report.

YOUR PERSONAL REPORT

King leads your blend.

40 answers, interpreted with questionnaire version 1. One pattern currently leads, but your other scores are part of the picture. This report adds structured reflection to the free result; it does not make the test more scientifically certain.

King77.5 / 100
Lover52.5 / 100
Warrior52.5 / 100
Magician27.5 / 100
01

King

78 / 100 endorsement

You endorsed many of the statements for this pattern. You are drawn to creating order that helps other people thrive. The King pattern is about responsibility, perspective, and making space for others to contribute.

Your responses within this pattern are relatively similar. The average gives a useful compact summary, but it still reflects only the situations covered by these statements.

You may be the person who clarifies the purpose of a project, settles competing priorities, or notices who has been left out of a decision. You tend to think beyond the next task to what a group needs over time.

A strength to consider: You can bring steadiness to uncertain situations. At your best, authority becomes service: expectations are clear, credit is shared, and people have room to do good work.

A tension to watch for, if it resonates: Responsibility can become control when you assume that every outcome depends on you. A useful warning sign is feeling personally threatened when someone succeeds in a different way.

These strengths and tensions are reflection prompts associated with the pattern. Your answers do not establish that each one is true of you.

An experiment

Choose one decision you usually keep. Agree on the outcome and boundaries, then let someone else choose the method. Ask what support they want before offering a solution.

A question to sit with

Where am I protecting a shared purpose, and where am I protecting my preferred way of doing things?

Your actual responses

When a group loses direction, I help it agree on what matters most.

Mostly like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I think about how today's decisions will affect the people who come after me.

Very much like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I make a point of recognizing other people's contributions.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I am willing to make a difficult decision when others depend on me.

Mostly like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I try to create conditions in which other people can do their best work.

Mostly like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I tend to leave shared responsibilities for someone else to organize.

Not like meReverse-scored: agreement lowers this dimension.

I can keep a longer-term purpose in view during a disagreement.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I feel responsible for making expectations clear when I lead something.

Mostly like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I rarely consider the effect of my decisions on a wider group.

A little like meReverse-scored: agreement lowers this dimension.

When I have influence, I look for ways to help others become more capable.

Very much like meAgreement raises this dimension.
02

Lover

53 / 100 endorsement

Your endorsement of this pattern sits in the middle range. You are drawn to emotional connection, beauty, and experiences that make life feel vivid. The Lover pattern notices meaning in relationships and in the details of everyday experience.

Your responses within this pattern are relatively similar. The average gives a useful compact summary, but it still reflects only the situations covered by these statements.

You may notice a change in someone's mood, make a gathering feel welcoming, or bring a strong response to music, nature, and art. Relationships can be a source of motivation as well as enjoyment.

A strength to consider: You can bring warmth and attention to places that have become purely functional. At your best, connection leaves room for two people to have different feelings and needs.

A tension to watch for, if it resonates: Sensitivity can become overextension if you treat another person's emotions as your responsibility. Intensity can also make ordinary, steady experiences seem less valuable than they are.

These strengths and tensions are reflection prompts associated with the pattern. Your answers do not establish that each one is true of you.

An experiment

Choose one experience to enjoy without improving, recording, or sharing it. In a relationship, state a preference clearly while remaining curious about the other person's preference.

A question to sit with

Can I stay connected without giving up the boundary that keeps the connection sustainable?

Your actual responses

Music, art, or a place in nature can affect me deeply.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I notice small details that make an experience feel meaningful.

Mostly like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I make room for emotional closeness in my relationships.

A little like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I can become absorbed in the enjoyment of an ordinary moment.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I pay attention to how another person is feeling during a conversation.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I rarely make time for experiences simply because I enjoy them.

A little like meReverse-scored: agreement lowers this dimension.

I value being able to express affection openly.

A little like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I want the things I make or choose to have a personal feel.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I tend to disconnect from my feelings as soon as they become noticeable.

Somewhat like meReverse-scored: agreement lowers this dimension.

Sharing an experience with someone can matter as much as the experience itself.

Mostly like meAgreement raises this dimension.
03

Warrior

53 / 100 endorsement

Your endorsement of this pattern sits in the middle range. You are drawn to decisive action, clear boundaries, and following through. The Warrior pattern brings energy to the moment when a choice needs to become a commitment.

Your responses within this pattern are relatively similar. The average gives a useful compact summary, but it still reflects only the situations covered by these statements.

You may tackle the difficult conversation, protect time for a goal, or keep going after enthusiasm wears off. Concrete responsibilities and visible progress often feel more useful than prolonged discussion.

A strength to consider: You can turn intentions into reliable action. At your best, courage includes restraint: you choose which conflicts matter and defend a boundary without needing to defeat another person.

A tension to watch for, if it resonates: Determination can become an endless state of mobilization. If rest feels like failure or every disagreement feels like a contest, the pattern may be working harder than the situation requires.

These strengths and tensions are reflection prompts associated with the pattern. Your answers do not establish that each one is true of you.

An experiment

Name one commitment worth protecting this week and one conflict you can leave alone. Give recovery a place in the plan, alongside the action itself.

A question to sit with

What is this effort in service of, and would more force actually help?

Your actual responses

I can begin a necessary task even when I do not feel motivated.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I state a boundary when something important to me is being compromised.

Mostly like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I keep working toward a chosen goal after the initial excitement fades.

A little like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I would rather address a difficult issue than keep avoiding it.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

A demanding challenge can sharpen my focus.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I often abandon a commitment as soon as it becomes uncomfortable.

A little like meReverse-scored: agreement lowers this dimension.

I am prepared to act on a considered decision without everyone's approval.

A little like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I protect time for the commitments I have chosen.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I find it hard to turn a clear intention into a concrete first step.

Somewhat like meReverse-scored: agreement lowers this dimension.

I can tolerate short-term discomfort for something I believe is worth doing.

Mostly like meAgreement raises this dimension.
04

Magician

28 / 100 endorsement

You endorsed relatively few of the statements for this pattern. You are drawn to understanding how things work and seeing possibilities beneath the obvious. The Magician pattern connects observation, skill, and a change in perspective.

Your responses within this pattern are relatively similar. The average gives a useful compact summary, but it still reflects only the situations covered by these statements.

You may enjoy learning a system, tracing the source of a problem, or explaining a difficult idea in a useful way. You often want to understand the mechanism before committing to a solution.

A strength to consider: You can make complicated situations easier to navigate. At your best, expertise is shared generously and a good explanation helps other people become more capable.

A tension to watch for, if it resonates: Understanding can become a way to remain at a safe distance. Gathering another insight may delay an experiment, and being the person with the answer can make it difficult to admit uncertainty.

A lower score can mean this pattern feels less familiar, less relevant right now, or less well represented by the wording. It does not prove you lack the strengths described here.

An experiment

Turn one idea into a small test with an observable outcome. Explain the idea to someone outside your specialty, then ask which part still seems unclear.

A question to sit with

What would I try if I did not need to understand the whole situation first?

Your actual responses

I enjoy discovering the mechanism behind a problem.

A little like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I notice connections between ideas that initially seem unrelated.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I am willing to spend time learning a skill before I see a payoff.

Not like meAgreement raises this dimension.

People sometimes turn to me to make a complicated idea easier to understand.

A little like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I question an explanation when it does not fit what I observe.

A little like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I am usually uninterested in why a familiar process works.

Somewhat like meReverse-scored: agreement lowers this dimension.

I like testing whether a different perspective changes a problem.

Not like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I pay attention to patterns that repeat across different situations.

A little like meAgreement raises this dimension.

I prefer to keep useful knowledge to myself rather than explain it.

Mostly like meReverse-scored: agreement lowers this dimension.

Understanding something deeply is rewarding to me in its own right.

Somewhat like meAgreement raises this dimension.

Read the patterns together.

King alongside Lover

Your scores are 77.5 and 52.5. Consider a situation in which stewardship & direction and connection & aliveness both mattered. Write down what each pattern helped you notice, what it left out, and what you actually chose. A blend describes coexistence; it is not a separate measured type.

A different lens: Magician

Magician scores 27.5 in your answers. Try its reflection prompt in a situation where your usual approach feels stuck: “What would I try if I did not need to understand the whole situation first?” Exploring another pattern does not require raising a score or changing your identity.

Your seven-day reflection plan.

01

Check the fit

Read the King section and write one recent example that fits it and one that does not.

02

Read an answer closely

Choose a statement you strongly agreed or disagreed with. Name the setting and people you had in mind. Would a different setting change your answer?

03

Try a small experiment

Choose one decision you usually keep. Agree on the outcome and boundaries, then let someone else choose the method. Ask what support they want before offering a solution.

04

Consider another perspective

Choose one experience to enjoy without improving, recording, or sharing it. In a relationship, state a preference clearly while remaining curious about the other person's preference.

05

Ask for an example

If you want, ask someone you trust for an example of a time you handled a situation well. Listen for the behavior they describe rather than asking them to confirm your label.

06

Notice a tradeoff

Where am I protecting a shared purpose, and where am I protecting my preferred way of doing things?

07

Keep what proved useful

Review your notes. Choose one practice to keep, one description that did not fit, and one question to leave open. A useful reflection can change your behavior without settling your type.

This original questionnaire and its scoring have not been independently validated. Scores summarize self-reported answers; they are not population percentiles, diagnostic results, or probabilities. Do not use them for hiring, health decisions, or judgments about another person's worth. The report is generated from fixed editorial rules, without an AI service.